<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook: new social network site; same old walled garden</title>
	<atom:link href="http://derivadow.com/2007/07/03/facebook-new-social-network-site-same-old-walled-garden/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://derivadow.com/2007/07/03/facebook-new-social-network-site-same-old-walled-garden/</link>
	<description>...is a blog by Tom Scott a place where I ramble about my thoughts and observations on the open web, linked data, URIs and generally how technology and design can create great things for people to use.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:20:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Media companies should embrace the generative nature of the web &#171; Derivadow.com</title>
		<link>http://derivadow.com/2007/07/03/facebook-new-social-network-site-same-old-walled-garden/#comment-2319</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Media companies should embrace the generative nature of the web &#171; Derivadow.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 18:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derivadow.com/2007/07/03/facebook-new-social-network-site-same-old-walled-garden/#comment-2319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] mean that what you build must be generative. There are, after all, plenty of successful walled gardens and tethered appliances out there. The answer, in part, depends on what you believe the future of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mean that what you build must be generative. There are, after all, plenty of successful walled gardens and tethered appliances out there. The answer, in part, depends on what you believe the future of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Data Portability - the need for DRM &#171; Derivadow.com</title>
		<link>http://derivadow.com/2007/07/03/facebook-new-social-network-site-same-old-walled-garden/#comment-1837</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Data Portability - the need for DRM &#171; Derivadow.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 09:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derivadow.com/2007/07/03/facebook-new-social-network-site-same-old-walled-garden/#comment-1837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Facebook because it&#8217;s a walled garden and walled gardens, as the name suggests, makes too tough to get data out. The pertinent question then is who owns the data - is it Facebook, Robert Scoble or each [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Facebook because it&#8217;s a walled garden and walled gardens, as the name suggests, makes too tough to get data out. The pertinent question then is who owns the data &#8211; is it Facebook, Robert Scoble or each [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OpenSocial Google&#8217;s answer to Facebook&#8217;s walled garden &#171; Derivadow.com</title>
		<link>http://derivadow.com/2007/07/03/facebook-new-social-network-site-same-old-walled-garden/#comment-1813</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OpenSocial Google&#8217;s answer to Facebook&#8217;s walled garden &#171; Derivadow.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 19:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derivadow.com/2007/07/03/facebook-new-social-network-site-same-old-walled-garden/#comment-1813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] rather than trying to tie users and developers in and is exactly what I was wittering on about previously. This is also bad news for [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rather than trying to tie users and developers in and is exactly what I was wittering on about previously. This is also bad news for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OpenSocial Google&#8217;s answer to Facebook&#8217;s walled garden &#171; Derivadow</title>
		<link>http://derivadow.com/2007/07/03/facebook-new-social-network-site-same-old-walled-garden/#comment-1664</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OpenSocial Google&#8217;s answer to Facebook&#8217;s walled garden &#171; Derivadow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 23:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derivadow.com/2007/07/03/facebook-new-social-network-site-same-old-walled-garden/#comment-1664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] rather than trying to tie users and developers in and is exactly what I was wittering on about previously. This is also bad news for [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rather than trying to tie users and developers in and is exactly what I was wittering on about previously. This is also bad news for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://derivadow.com/2007/07/03/facebook-new-social-network-site-same-old-walled-garden/#comment-1276</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 19:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derivadow.com/2007/07/03/facebook-new-social-network-site-same-old-walled-garden/#comment-1276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATE

It looks like &lt;a href=&quot;http://scobleizer.com/2007/08/02/the-latest-shiny-social-object-an-opencontrollable-social-network/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Plaxo are about to launch&lt;/a&gt; an inside out Facebook service: &quot;&lt;em&gt;a new social network that’s both open as well as controllable... a social network that lets me own my own data and take it out of Plaxo and put it on other social networks... a social network that lets me control which groups of friends (or family) that can see certain items&lt;/em&gt;.&quot; Now that&#039;s what I&#039;m talking about! :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE</p>
<p>It looks like <a href="http://scobleizer.com/2007/08/02/the-latest-shiny-social-object-an-opencontrollable-social-network/" rel="nofollow">Plaxo are about to launch</a> an inside out Facebook service: &#8220;<em>a new social network that’s both open as well as controllable&#8230; a social network that lets me own my own data and take it out of Plaxo and put it on other social networks&#8230; a social network that lets me control which groups of friends (or family) that can see certain items</em>.&#8221; Now that&#8217;s what I&#8217;m talking about! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

