<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The web as a CMS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://derivadow.com/2009/01/13/the-web-as-a-cms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://derivadow.com/2009/01/13/the-web-as-a-cms/</link>
	<description>...is a blog by Tom Scott a place where I ramble about my thoughts and observations on the open web, linked data, URIs and generally how technology and design can create great things for people to use.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:47:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Scott</title>
		<link>http://derivadow.com/2009/01/13/the-web-as-a-cms/#comment-3408</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derivadow.com/?p=939#comment-3408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So implicit in your concern is the belief that the BBC is able to ensure higher degrees of accuracy than say Wikipedia, or musicbrainz. For some subjects this may well be true but for others probably not. There are obviously numerous reasons for this, including the publication of new research, failure to identify the appropriate research etc. etc. 

These sources of error are true for both the BBC and e.g. Wikipedia but Wikipedia has many more people, often more expert in the subject editing and reviewing a document. In other words often the error rate is less than in e.g. the BBC. This of course won&#039;t always be true.

The other advantage Wikipedia has is that it is much better at citing sources than media companies and as such it is easier to check the quoted data.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So implicit in your concern is the belief that the BBC is able to ensure higher degrees of accuracy than say Wikipedia, or musicbrainz. For some subjects this may well be true but for others probably not. There are obviously numerous reasons for this, including the publication of new research, failure to identify the appropriate research etc. etc. </p>
<p>These sources of error are true for both the BBC and e.g. Wikipedia but Wikipedia has many more people, often more expert in the subject editing and reviewing a document. In other words often the error rate is less than in e.g. the BBC. This of course won&#8217;t always be true.</p>
<p>The other advantage Wikipedia has is that it is much better at citing sources than media companies and as such it is easier to check the quoted data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Peterson</title>
		<link>http://derivadow.com/2009/01/13/the-web-as-a-cms/#comment-3407</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J Peterson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 17:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derivadow.com/?p=939#comment-3407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi - am late to the party, it seems. If you&#039;re still answering this, have you thoughts/ideas about the implications of open-editing? I&#039;m an MLIS and working ontologist, and I am (in theory) a big proponent of Linked Data and semweb, but the librarian part of me cringes when I think about just anyone being able to edit something that will end up on a supposedly authoritative site. Wikipedia was meant for community, so I expect a degree of error, but what about authority sites? It would be like going to Amazon music and understanding that their track listings may or may not be right. Are some BBC sites meant to be less exact than others? How do you ensure quality content?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi &#8211; am late to the party, it seems. If you&#8217;re still answering this, have you thoughts/ideas about the implications of open-editing? I&#8217;m an MLIS and working ontologist, and I am (in theory) a big proponent of Linked Data and semweb, but the librarian part of me cringes when I think about just anyone being able to edit something that will end up on a supposedly authoritative site. Wikipedia was meant for community, so I expect a degree of error, but what about authority sites? It would be like going to Amazon music and understanding that their track listings may or may not be right. Are some BBC sites meant to be less exact than others? How do you ensure quality content?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Georgi Kobilarov &#187; The web as a CMS</title>
		<link>http://derivadow.com/2009/01/13/the-web-as-a-cms/#comment-3080</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Georgi Kobilarov &#187; The web as a CMS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 09:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derivadow.com/?p=939#comment-3080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Scott wrote one year ago a great post about using the web as a CMS at the BBC, in which he describes how BBC editors contribute to websites like Musicbrainz and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Scott wrote one year ago a great post about using the web as a CMS at the BBC, in which he describes how BBC editors contribute to websites like Musicbrainz and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Scott</title>
		<link>http://derivadow.com/2009/01/13/the-web-as-a-cms/#comment-3052</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 12:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derivadow.com/?p=939#comment-3052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps you could try printing it off - that way the links won&#039;t distract you?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps you could try printing it off &#8211; that way the links won&#8217;t distract you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timothy</title>
		<link>http://derivadow.com/2009/01/13/the-web-as-a-cms/#comment-3050</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[timothy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 17:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derivadow.com/?p=939#comment-3050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From a usability standpoint I found it shockingly annoying to read  your article with all of its links.  It&#039;s very choppy with so many different things.  Maybe it&#039;s just this article cause your trying to make a point with it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a usability standpoint I found it shockingly annoying to read  your article with all of its links.  It&#8217;s very choppy with so many different things.  Maybe it&#8217;s just this article cause your trying to make a point with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SMIC 2010</title>
		<link>http://derivadow.com/2009/01/13/the-web-as-a-cms/#comment-3030</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SMIC 2010]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 16:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derivadow.com/?p=939#comment-3030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] ima [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ima [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Hemmer</title>
		<link>http://derivadow.com/2009/01/13/the-web-as-a-cms/#comment-2713</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Hemmer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 08:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derivadow.com/?p=939#comment-2713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found your blog by chance . but i have to say that it&#039;s great blog very useful information and very interesting subjects just greetings and good luck 
i&#039;m not going i will be always checking for updates.I&#039;m very interested in CMS and all its related subjects.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found your blog by chance . but i have to say that it&#8217;s great blog very useful information and very interesting subjects just greetings and good luck<br />
i&#8217;m not going i will be always checking for updates.I&#8217;m very interested in CMS and all its related subjects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linking bbc.co.uk to the Linked Data cloud &#171; Derivadow.com</title>
		<link>http://derivadow.com/2009/01/13/the-web-as-a-cms/#comment-2595</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Linking bbc.co.uk to the Linked Data cloud &#171; Derivadow.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derivadow.com/?p=939#comment-2595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Because we’re now thinking on a webscale we’ve started to think about the web as a CMS. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Because we’re now thinking on a webscale we’ve started to think about the web as a CMS. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Åsa says &#187; links for 2009-02-03</title>
		<link>http://derivadow.com/2009/01/13/the-web-as-a-cms/#comment-2494</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Åsa says &#187; links for 2009-02-03]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 23:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derivadow.com/?p=939#comment-2494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The web as a CMS « Derivadow.com (tags: webb cms framtiden inspiration attläsa) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The web as a CMS « Derivadow.com (tags: webb cms framtiden inspiration attläsa) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Scott</title>
		<link>http://derivadow.com/2009/01/13/the-web-as-a-cms/#comment-2475</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derivadow.com/?p=939#comment-2475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Frankie -- You&#039;re right that if it got to the point where any one person needed to edit 10 different data sources to update something then that would be a problem. But I suspect that in reality even if the BBC had this many (web) data sources to worry about then it&#039;s very unlikely that any individual would. 

But should it arise then updating via an API is one solution. However, there are problems with this -- firstly as you say it distances people from the community, but it also creates a burden on the development team to keep our UI in sync with the API (assuming there is one).

Re the notability problem -- it is a risk (and something that was clocked early on in the project). But there are a couple of &#039;solutions&#039; firstly this is only likely to be a problem either for artists that don&#039;t get played on the BBC or are only played once or twice. You then need to question whether not having a biog matters. But if it does then we can provide some text from our own CMS until the artist is notable enough to have a Wikipedia entry.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Frankie &#8212; You&#8217;re right that if it got to the point where any one person needed to edit 10 different data sources to update something then that would be a problem. But I suspect that in reality even if the BBC had this many (web) data sources to worry about then it&#8217;s very unlikely that any individual would. </p>
<p>But should it arise then updating via an API is one solution. However, there are problems with this &#8212; firstly as you say it distances people from the community, but it also creates a burden on the development team to keep our UI in sync with the API (assuming there is one).</p>
<p>Re the notability problem &#8212; it is a risk (and something that was clocked early on in the project). But there are a couple of &#8216;solutions&#8217; firstly this is only likely to be a problem either for artists that don&#8217;t get played on the BBC or are only played once or twice. You then need to question whether not having a biog matters. But if it does then we can provide some text from our own CMS until the artist is notable enough to have a Wikipedia entry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

